Svar till Erotisk_Eruption [Gå till post]:
Nu gömmer du dig bara bakom en skrud av ignorans.
Vi har beviat för dig att en teori är den starkaste bevisningen en vetenskap kan förse oss med.
Du hävdar att koranen meddelar oss vetenskaplig fakta.
Om koranen = vetenskaplig fakta, så borde koranen = vetenskapliga teorier.
Eftersom fakta komemr från teorier och bevis.
Eftersom koranens fakta ≠ vetenskapliga teorier, i dne meningen att teorierna överbevisar koranens hypoteser, så vinner vetenskapen och du har fel och är ignorant.
Nu gömmer du dig bara bakom en skrud av ignorans.
Vi har beviat för dig att en teori är den starkaste bevisningen en vetenskap kan förse oss med.
Du hävdar att koranen meddelar oss vetenskaplig fakta.
Om koranen = vetenskaplig fakta, så borde koranen = vetenskapliga teorier.
Eftersom fakta komemr från teorier och bevis.
Eftersom koranens fakta ≠ vetenskapliga teorier, i dne meningen att teorierna överbevisar koranens hypoteser, så vinner vetenskapen och du har fel och är ignorant.
Jag kan inte tro mina ögon det du skrev nyss, du säger att jag gömmer mig bakom ignorans, och vad gör ni, ni försöker övertyga mig att tro på evolutionsteori, ALLTSÅ TEORI, som kan var rätt eller falsk
men kolla här t.ex
THE MYTH OF HUMAN EVOLUTION IS
FILLED WITH HOAXES
More than 6,000 species of ape have existed at one time or another. The great majority of them have since become extinct and vanished, leaving only some 120 species alive today. But the fossils belonging to these nearly 6,000 extinct species represent a rich source of hoaxes for evolutionists. Unable to point to any concrete evidence, evolutionists surround fossils of extinct apes with biased analyses and then present them as evidence for evolution.
For years now, evolutionists have been employing such methods in order to gather supporters and mislead the public. However, they now need to see that these methods are of no use. The false evidence used by evolutionists to make their tall tales of the alleged human evolution seem more credible—and the debunking of that evidence—are summarized below. However, there are many more evolutionist hoaxes than the few considered here. All the “ancestor of man” reports in the media, as well as the illustrations accompanying them are completely fictitious. Concrete scientific discoveries have now demolished the story that human beings became human by means of a gradual course of development.
Piltdown Man: A fossil skull was discovered in 1912 and described as belonging to a half-human, half-ape species. For the next 40 years or so, evolutionists used this fossil as one of their supposedly strongest pieces of evidence, making countless analyses and illustrations of it in a statement issued on 21 November 1953, however, Piltdown Man was finally declared to be a hoax. A dating test performed 40 years after its discovery revealed that the jawbone and the skull did not actually belong to each other.
More detailed examination revealed that the “Piltdown Man” skull had been assembled by adding an orangutan jaw to a human skull, which was then aged using potassium dichromate. The way that the skull had been displayed in London’s Natural History Museum for 40 years and that no permission had been given for detailed scientific studies to be carried out during that time has gone down as a major scientific scandal.
Fossils discovered on the islands of Java in 1891 and 1892 were given the name Java Man (Pithecanthropus erectus).
Fossils discovered near Pekin in 1923-1927 were given the name Pekin Man (Sinanthropus pekinensis). In 1939, however, two experts, Ralph von Koenigswald and Franz Weidenreich, revealed that both were actually normal
human beings.(1) And Ernst Mayr from Harvard University had classified both as human in 1944.(2)
ALL THE SKULL THOUGHT TO REPRESENT EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION HAVE BEEN DECLASSIFIED!
Nebraska Man: A single tooth, discovered in 1922 by Henry F. Osborn of the American Museum of Natural History, was depicted as belonging to an intermediate life form between apes and human beings. However, in an article published in Science magazine in 1927, Osborn’s colleague William Gregory stated that the tooth actually belonged to a wild boar—whereupon all evolutionist claims regarding the fossil were quietly laid aside. The illustration to the side, produced on the basis of a single tooth by evolutionists of the time, was published in the press.
This attempt by evolutionists to reconstruct a living thing on the basis of a single tooth is a striking instance of how biased and misleading they can be when it comes to defending and imposing their theories.
The illustration above shows the Homo sapiens neanderthalensis Amud 1 skull discovered in Israel. Its owner has been estimated to be 1.80 meters. tall, and its brain volume is the greatest so far discovered: 1740 cubic centimeters
Neanderthal Man: After the first specimens were discovered in the Neander Valley in 1856, evolutionists suggested that Neanderthals were primitive ape-men. Subsequent archaeological discoveries, however, revealed that there was no scientific basis to that claim. Erik Trinkhaus, an expert on the subject of the Neanderthals and also an evolutionist, has admitted that, “Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans.”(4)
In addition, the size of the Neanderthal Man skull—200 cubic centimeters greater than that of present-day humans—reveals the invalidity of the claim that it was an intermediate form between humans and apes.
The Taung Child: A fossil skull discovered by Raymond Dart in South Africa in 1924 was initially depicted as a supposed ancestor of man. However, contemporary evolutionists can no longer maintain that it represents such an ancestor—because it subsequently transpired that the skull belonged to a young gorilla! The famous anatomist Bernard Wood stated that this fossil constitutes no evidence in favor of evolution in an article published in New Scientist magazine. (5)
Lucy: This fossil, discovered in Africa in 1974, was widely esteemed by evolutionists and was the subject of some of the most intensive speculation. Recently however, it has been revealed that Lucy (A. afarensis) had an anatomy ideally suited to climbing trees and was no different from other apes we are familiar with.(6) The French scientific journal Science et Vie covered the story in 1999 under the headline “Adieu, Lucy.” One study, performed in 2000, discovered a locking system in Lucy’s forearms enabling it to walk using the knuckles, in the same way as modern-day chimps.(7)
In the face of all these findings, many evolutionist experts declared that Lucy could not have been a forerunner of man.(8)
Så du vill att jag ska tro på dina teorier som kan vara falska, som andra förutt har trott att dessa skallar var bevis för evolution men som sedan visade sig falska
Men när jag postar t.ex flera verser ur Koranen , t.ex där Gud säger att universum expanderar, och sedan har vi västerländska forskare som bekräftar det att koranen kommer från Gud, (komm ihåg västerländska,inte muslimska, så att ni kan säga, de är muslimer, vi måste ha opartiska forsakare, där har ni de))
och ni avvisar det, genom att säga, de är bakåtsträvande, de så och så, bla bla bla
Och så pratar ni om ignorans med mig, DET ÄR NI SOM ÄR IGNORERAR MINA BEVIS OCH VÄSTERLÄNDSKA FORSKARE SOM SÄGER ATT INFO I KORANEN MÅSE KOMMA FRÅN GUD
